Deep-sea mining involves extracting minerals from the ocean floor, hundreds to thousands of feet below the surface of the water. The risks of irreversible damage to biodiversity are very high. For example, a recent study by the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ) shows that manganese nodules contain much more life than expected. We still don't understand life on the seabed enough to understand the consequences of deep-sea mining.

The adoption of the so-called High Seas Treaty in June 2023 was an important step towards extending the responsibility of governments beyond national borders to conserve and sustainably manage vital habitats and plant and animal species on the high seas and the international seabed area. Despite this treaty, Norway, a state that has become rich thanks to oil extraction in the North Sea, is debating a permit for deep-sea exploration near Svalbard. More countries are considering doing the same. That would be a worrying step to actually harvest minerals from the bottom of the sea.

Deep-sea mining may seem like a panacea for the energy transition to some. The demand for precious minerals is high. For the transition to green, renewable energy, precious metals such as cobalt, nickel, and copper are critical, as they are needed in batteries, solar panels, and electric vehicles. Current supply chains are problematic due to serious human rights violations in mining, child labor, forced labor, and generally unsafe working conditions.

However, we cannot afford to use deep-sea mining to solving in an attempt to solve existing problems. In any case, mining minerals from the seabed will not solve the current problems with mining on land. Rather, it creates an additional, ecological problem.

Sustainable technology requires certain minerals, but it doesn't mean that this has to be a large amount of new materials. Before we take the demand for new minerals as a given, we need to look at our consumption patterns. First, let's focus on reducing energy consumption, recycling minerals, and smart choices like replacing the growing demand for electric vehicles with better rail infrastructure. Scraping new material from the bottom of the sea is an easy escape from not thinking about these more profound solutions.

This is an obvious responsibility for the financial sector. After all, without loans or investments, deep-sea mining will not get off the ground. The responsibility of banks, pension funds and asset managers, for example, is not to finance or invest in deep-sea mining. Although some investors obscure their responsibility by claiming that they engage with companies involved in deep-sea mining, disastrous damage to the environment can only be prevented by excluding this harmful activity.

A factor in this is that financial institutions not only have a moral obligation, they also run the risk of financing a stranded asset of the future. The latest research results on the impact of deep-sea mining on the environment are so worrying that it is questionable whether there will be permits for commercial exploitation at all.

Let the financial sector really take the lead here. Deep-sea mining should be an absolute no-go.